Safetensors
GGUF
English
chain-of-thought
cot-reasoning
step-by-step-reasoning
systematic-research-planning
academic-assistant
academic-planning
thesis-planning
dissertation-planning
research-question-formulation
literature-review-planning
methodology-design
experimental-design
qualitative-research-planning
quantitative-research-planning
mixed-methods-planning
student-research-assistant
phd-support
postgraduate-tool
early-career-researcher
grant-writing-assistant
research-proposal-helper
cross-disciplinary-research
interdisciplinary-methodology
academic-mentorship-tool
research-evaluation-assistant
independent-researcher-tool
r-and-d-assistant
reasoning-model
structured-output
systematic-analysis
problem-decomposition
research-breakdown
actionable-planning
scientific-research
social-science-research
humanities-research
medical-research-planning
engineering-research
business-research
mistral-based
mistral-fine-tune
lora-adaptation
foundation-model
instruction-tuned
7b-parameters
ai-research-assistant
research-automation
sota-research-planning
hypothesis-generation
experiment-design-assistant
literature-analysis
paper-outline-generator
structured-output-generation
systematic-reasoning
detailed-planning
zero-shot-planning
research-summarization
biomedical-research-assistant
clinical-trial-planning
tech-r-and-d
materials-science
computational-research
data-science-assistant
literature-synthesis
meta-analysis-helper
best-research-assistant-model
top-research-planning-model
research-ai-assistant
ai-research-mentor
academic-planning-ai
research-workflow-automation
quantum-computing-research
ai-ml-research-planning
cybersecurity-research
neuroscience-research-planning
genomics-research
robotics-research-planning
climate-science-research
behavioral-economics-research
educational-technology-research
research-plan-generator
methodology-recommendation
data-collection-planning
analysis-strategy-development
implementation-planning
evaluation-framework-design
challenge-identification
resource-requirement-analysis
technical-limitation-assessment
research-gap-analysis
knowledge-synthesis
practical-research-tools
affordable-research-assistant
systematic-planning-tool
comprehensive-research-framework
research-project-management
researcher-productivity-tool
text-to-research-plan
dual-output-model
think-answer-format
evidence-based-research-planning
research-mentoring
science-domains-expert
engineering-domains-expert
social-science-domains-expert
multidisciplinary-research
structured-research-planning
hierarchical-plan-generator
convergent-thinking
divergent-thinking
research-ideation
experimental-protocol-design
mistral-research-assistant
focused-research-scope
quantitative-analysis-planning
portable-research-assistant
education-research-tool
Research-Reasoner-7B-v0.3
Research-Reasoner-7B
Research-Reasoner
conversational

Research-Reasoner-7B-v0.3 Logo Research-Reasoner-7B-v0.3 transforms complex research challenges into structured, actionable plans. This open source model, built on Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 with LoRA fine-tuning, shows its work through systematic reasoning before delivering clear project breakdowns and methodology recommendations.

Key Capabilities

  • Systematic Planning: Shows step-by-step reasoning before delivering research plans
  • Methodological Guidance: Identifies appropriate research methodologies and analysis techniques
  • Implementation Strategy: Suggests practical approaches based on research requirements and constraints

See It In Action:

Input Example:

Research Topic: "Hybrid Quantum-Classical Algorithms for Scalable Variational Quantum Simulation of Strongly Correlated Materials"
Let's think step by step:

Output Example:

The model produces structured output with two components:

1. The Thinking Process

<think>
I need to think through how to plan this research project.

I should start by considering what this topic involves and what foundational knowledge I need. I'd need to understand hybrid quantum-classical algorithms, variational quantum simulation techniques, and the challenges of simulating strongly correlated materials. Gathering information about current limitations in classical simulations and recent advances in quantum computing would be essential. Reviewing existing work on VQE (Variational Quantum Eigensolver), QAOA (Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm), and other hybrid approaches would help me identify gaps and refine my focus.

Next, I should determine the best research design. One way to approach this could be developing new algorithmic variants that combine different quantum-classical approaches, but that might present challenges such as maintaining convergence properties. An alternative would be focusing on optimizing existing algorithms for specific material classes, which could address some issues but introduce other trade-offs like reduced generality. I need to weigh factors such as computational complexity, hardware constraints, and accuracy requirements, and constraints like available quantum hardware access to decide on the most effective approach.

I should then consider data collection. I need to decide whether existing data from classical simulations is sufficient or if new quantum simulation runs are necessary. If I need to gather new data, possible methods include running experiments on quantum simulators or actual quantum processors, but I have to account for factors like noise and error rates. Ethical or logistical challenges such as limited access to quantum hardware or proprietary classical simulation datasets could also influence my decision.

Once I have data, I need to determine how to analyze it. The most suitable methods might be comparative benchmarking against classical results or possibly techniques like parameter landscape analysis depending on the nature of the data. To ensure accuracy and reliability, I should incorporate statistical error analysis and validate my results using multiple quantum backends or different classical simulation approaches.

I should next address implementation. This project would require resources like access to quantum computing platforms (IBM Q, Rigetti, etc.), classical computing clusters, and quantum chemistry software packages. I need to consider practical issues such as qubit connectivity limitations and coherence times. Working with experimental quantum hardware groups might help me overcome some obstacles, while securing cloud-based quantum computing credits could make execution more feasible.

To assess whether my research is successful, I need to establish clear criteria. I should measure success by improvements in convergence rates, reduction in classical computation requirements, or new insights into material properties, and validate my findings through reproducibility across different systems. Comparing results with exact classical solutions where available would help confirm their significance.

Finally, I need to reflect on the value of this research. The findings could be applied to accelerate materials discovery or contribute to knowledge in quantum chemistry. Future work could explore scaling these methods to larger systems based on these results, potentially leading to further developments in quantum advantage for condensed matter physics.
</think>

2. The Structured Research Plan

<answer>
Here's a structured research plan for "Hybrid Quantum-Classical Algorithms for Scalable Variational Quantum Simulation of Strongly Correlated Materials":

1. Initial preparation and background work
   - Literature review of hybrid quantum-classical algorithms
   - Study of variational quantum simulation methods
   - Analysis of challenges in simulating strongly correlated materials

2. Research design and methodology approaches
   - Development/selection of algorithmic framework
   - Design of hybrid quantum-classical optimization procedures
   - Formulation of benchmarking protocols

3. Data collection strategies
   - Identification of target material systems
   - Generation of classical simulation data for comparison
   - Planning of quantum hardware experiments (simulators vs. real devices)

4. Analysis methods
   - Performance metrics development
   - Convergence behavior analysis
   - Statistical error characterization

5. Implementation considerations
   - Quantum hardware/software platform selection
   - Classical computing resource allocation
   - Error mitigation strategies

6. Evaluation approaches
   - Comparative benchmarking with classical methods
   - Assessment of computational complexity
   - Validation of physical insights

7. Potential applications of findings
   - Identification of promising material candidates
   - Development of improved simulation protocols
   - Guidance for quantum hardware development
</answer>

Getting Started

1. Installation

Choose your deployment method and install the required dependencies:

# For SafeTensors
pip install torch transformers accelerate safetensors
# For LLaMa.cpp
pip install llama-cpp-python

2. Configuration

Edit your chosen inference script to customize the analysis:

  • Input data: Update the RESEARCH_TOPIC variable with your research question
  • Model location: Set the model_path variable to your downloaded model directory

3. Running Analysis

Run your script and the research plan will appear in the terminal:

# For SafeTensors
python Inference_safetensors.py
# For LLaMa.cpp
python Inference_llama.cpp.py

Repository Contents

  • Model_Weights/ - All model weights in various formats
    • llama.cpp/ - LLaMA.cpp compatible weights with various quantization options available
    • safetensors/ - SafeTensors format models
    • LoRA_adapter/ - LoRA adapter weights
  • Scripts/ - Ready-to-use inference scripts
    • Inference_llama.cpp.py - For LLaMA.cpp deployment
    • Inference_safetensors.py - For SafeTensors deployment
  • Data/ - Training data
    • Train-Ready.jsonl - Complete JSONL training dataset
  • Training/ - Training documentation and logs
    • Training_Logs.txt - Complete terminal logs from the training process
    • Training_Documentation.txt - Detailed training specifications and parameters

Attribution

Research-Reasoner-7B-v0.3 was developed by Raymond Lee. If you use this model in your work, please include a reference to this repository. As of July 15th, 2025, this model has been downloaded 1,100 times. Thank you for your interest and support!

Downloads last month
190
GGUF
Model size
7.25B params
Architecture
llama
Hardware compatibility
Log In to view the estimation

2-bit

3-bit

4-bit

5-bit

6-bit

8-bit

16-bit

Inference Providers NEW
This model isn't deployed by any Inference Provider. ๐Ÿ™‹ Ask for provider support

Model tree for Raymond-dev-546730/Research-Reasoner-7B-v0.3

Quantized
(159)
this model